DNN Designer
Discussion Forums  

Welcome to the discussion forums page. Here you will find discussion forums dedicated to the discussion of Kendall County, State of Illinois and National Politics.

Login ::   Search
Kendall County Democratic Central Committee  

 

Chairman

Chuck Sutcliff

Vice Chairman

Jim Feeley

Vice Chairman

Paul Keller

Vice Chairman

Jim Lausier

Treasurer

Robyn Sutcliff

Secretary

Kelly Pfarrer

Sergeant at Arms

William Pfarrer

Quick Links  
Kendall County Democratic Forums  
Subject: Major General Paul D. Eaton's Response to Bush Veto

You are not authorized to post a reply.   
Author Messages
J.Lausier
Posts:57

05/03/2007 6:49 PM Alert 

Below is a letter addressed to President Bush. The author is Major General Paul D. Eaton.Eaton was charged with overseeing the creation of the Iraqi army from May 2003 to June 2004.  Here are a few links about the author:

 

About Paul Eaton From DOD June 2004 

NYT Op-Ed Authored By Gen. Eaton - March 2006

You Tube - Video Testimony Before the DPC

You Tube - Gen Eaton on Real Time with Bill Maher

 

 

 

 

 

May 1, 2007





President George W. Bush


The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington, DC 20500

 

 

Dear Mr. President,

 

 

Today, in your veto message regarding the bipartisan legislation just passed on Operation Iraqi Freedom, you asserted that you so decided because you listen to your commanders on the ground.

 

 

Respectfully, as your former commander on the ground, your administration did not listen to our best advice. In fact, a number of my fellow Generals were forced out of their jobs, because they did not tell you what you wanted to hear -- most notably General Eric Shinseki, whose foresight regarding troop levels was advice you rejected, at our troops' peril.

 

 

The legislation you vetoed today represented a course of action that is long overdue. This war can no longer be won by the military alone. We must bring to bear the entire array of national power - military, diplomatic and economic. The situation demands a surge in diplomacy, and pressure on the Iraqi government to fix its internal affairs. Further, the Army and Marine Corps are on the verge of breaking - or have been broken already - by the length and intensity of this war. This tempo is not sustainable - and you have failed to grow the ground forces to meet national security needs. We must begin the process of bringing troops home, and repairing and growing our military, if we are ever to have a combat-ready force for the long war on terror ahead of us.



 

The bill you rejected today sets benchmarks for success that the Iraqis would have to meet, and puts us on a course to redeploy our troops. It stresses the need for sending troops into battle only when they are rested, trained and equipped. In my view, and in the view of many others in the military that I know, that is the best course of action for our security.

 



As someone who served this nation for decades, I have the utmost respect for the office you hold. However, as a man of conscience, I could not sit idly by as you told the American people today that your veto was based on the recommendations of military men. Your administration ignored the advice of our military's finest minds before, and I see no evidence that you are listening to them now.

 



I urge you to reconsider your position, and work with Congress to pass a bill that achieves the goals laid out above.


 


Respectfully,


Major General Paul D. Eaton, USA, Retired








tbrophy
Posts:90

05/07/2007 9:20 AM Alert 
There is nothing more to add to General Eaton's respone other than HOOAH!!! I understand that those in the military have an obligation to follow orders. However, those in a leadership position also have a responsiblity to argue thier point. Objections during planning are imperitive to the decision making process in the military. This should be done without any fear or threat of retribution.

Colin Powell described this process best when he said something to the effect....I expect you to disagree with me and voice your opinions against mine until a decision is made - then I only want to hear "yes sir". He expected disagreement because he believed (as do I) that such disagreement developed better officers and leaders. It helped to develop creative thinking which is a force multiplier.

What's most unfortunate here is that "W" doesn't get it because he really is a crappy leader. I have to ask....how many more brave soldiers will die or come home with life altering injuries before this knucklehead figures it out....
Plainfieldrob
Posts:175

05/14/2007 3:18 PM Alert 

General Eaton has moved on from letter writing, now he is starring in commercials.

LINK

 

kpfarrer
Posts:210

05/16/2007 1:23 PM Alert 
A voice of reason, ignored, of course. Bush likes to argue but has no point.
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > Politics > National Politics > Major General Paul D. Eaton's Response to Bush Veto



ActiveForums 3.6
Account Login  


Register
Forgot Password ?

Organizations  


IlDemParty.gif

IlDemWoman.gif
 
YoungDemsIL.gif
Copyright 2007 by Kendall County Democratic Central Committee
Terms Of Use  ::  Privacy Statement